|
Title: |
|
Authors:
|
|
Abstract: Project monitoring often separates
objective control measures from implementers' assessments of the capabilities
that shape project success. This separation limits the practical usefulness of
both approaches. Earned Value Management (EVM) shows performance deviations,
but does not directly determine the managerial aspects that require attention.
In contrast, perception-based models identify relevant factors without pointing
out actual schedule and cost issues. This study integrates EVM, Partial Least
Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), and Importance–Performance Map
Analysis (IPMA) to diagnose the context of the selected road project
improvement packages in Indonesia. The survey data came from 114 project
personnel, while the schedule and cost data included the Tambakreja–Bantarsari
and Legundi–Planjan packages. Both packages were late, with Schedule
Performance Indices of 0.897 and 0.709, but remained cost-efficient, with Cost
Performance Indices of 1.029 and 1.298. The PLS-SEM results are used to weight
importance in IPMA, not to test determinants. Project procurement and labor
behavior are highly important but underperform, so they should be prioritized
for improvement. Management, planning, and organizational aspects perform
better and should be maintained. Schedule recovery should focus on smooth
procurement, supplier coordination, labor discipline, communication, and task
execution without weakening cost control. This integrated framework links a
project's objective status to actionable managerial priorities. Findings
indicate intervention prioritization, not causality. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.51505/ijaemr.2026.11504 |
|
PDF Download |